Dumb and Dumberer?

Lately, I’ve come to the sad and startling conclusion that reading a book has become difficult for me. I find myself getting confused if there are too many characters…or too many plot lines…or too many anythings. I’m constantly flipping back to previously read pages: Who the heck is so and so? What happened at such and such? The problem is compounded by the fact that I tend to read in bed, which means I’m only digesting a few pages a night. By the next night, when I turn to my bookmarked page, I read the first few lines and struggle to recall where the story left off.

I’ve always been an avid reader, so this new phenomenon has been distressing. I had just decided to chalk it up to an aging thing—my brain is way too full after all these years to absorb any information that is not absolutely essential—when I read an article entitled “Is Google Making Us Stoopid?” in the July/August issue of The Atlantic.

The basic premise of the article is that those of us who frequently use the Internet have experienced a shift in the way we think. We are power browsing, not deep reading. We jump from one tidbit of information to another, and instead of ingesting data, we become “mere decoders of information” (according to Maryanne Wolf, a develomental pychologist at Tufts University). We allow our attention to be scattered and our concentration diffused, and the result is that we compromise our ability to focus and comprehend. We avoid reading anything that we consider “too long,” because the Internet has conditioned us to seek, instead, quick bites of information on demand.

There’s a lot more to the article, but…um…I didn’t read the rest because it was too long.

2 thoughts on “Dumb and Dumberer?

  1. Penny Hill

    There’s a lot more to the article, but…um…I didn’t read the rest because it was too long.

    Ha ha ha ha.

    It’s an interesting theory, but I don’t buy it. I think our brains are pretty well trained by decades of use to suddenly go ADD because we spend time flitting around the Interwebs. However, if your brain is still forming pathways and doesn’t have much discipline yet (i.e., you’re a kid), then I think the theory probably has merit. Add to that the effect of all the media around them, and the flittage factor must soar. On the other hand — kids can play videogames for hours on end, so they are able to concentrate on SOMETHING.

    And by the way, I do not avoid reading books that are too long. I read doorstops. I do, however, avoid reading newspaper articles and many things online that are too long. I think THAT is the influence of USA Today and the dominance of radio and television news over newspaper coverage, which creates the expectation that we can get the gist of a story in 6 paragraphs. That’s a trend that pre-dates our googling.

    I could go on about this topic, but I probably lost you back at “pathways.”

    Hur hur hur. 😛

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s